3D Scan Forum

greenskynet wrote: ↑26 Dec 2021, 21:15
Anyway, RV also can be a good software if you can deal with some of its major limitations (specially camera choice limitation). but I always prefer FlexScan3D as a very engineered and professional software.

You should also read all of my more recent post.
Take your time.

Actually RV has some big limitations: 1- very limited camera choice (only accept some Daheng cameras) 2- Russian language 3- the type of marker which it use (only a circle dot, so sometimes it detect wrong markers) 4- very special calibration panel 5- and I think not good support for out of Russia ...

I like your setup Alonso
You did great!

I think that a part of the speed in Flexscan is due to a lower resolution of the cameras (and its higher speed of course).
In a future I would go for a DIY Flexscan, if they sell their projector again.

I agree.
Assistance is a great part of the quality of a tool.

It's cool, by the way.

sincronized camera and projector, high speed scanning.
It would be nice to get into details, and see if they sell the software/projector for DIY.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWRPxNila_I

Looks like an interesting solution, at around 5k

I would check the calibration and repeat it

Which scanner? David? HP?

Amazing. Also for the tiny resolution of the cameras. A completely different approach to scanning in structured light. I guess you can use a turntable with continuous rotation, is it implemented already? Or a turntable that rotates as soon as data are captured. Keep us updated and thanks for the cam...