David 5 VS Flexscan3d

Write here about construction, ideas, equipment, tips n tricks etc. related to structured light scanning
NARMELLA

Re: David 5 VS Flexscan3d

Post by NARMELLA »

erapip wrote: 24 May 2017, 12:04 Hello NARMELLA,

I'm using UI-1480-C, camera FUJINON HF12.5HA-1B (1:1.4/12.5mm). In MAX resolution the fps are low but for me is OK.

Regards,
Erald
Hi Erald ,
The shutter type of UI-1480-C is Rolling shutter and that's the cause of reduction of speed.
Can you please send some screen shot of your scanning results ?

Thanks
NARMELLA
spark
Posts: 43
Joined: 06 Mar 2017, 20:44

Re: David 5 VS Flexscan3d

Post by spark »

Hello, the imaging source cameras are not supported?
-I found a screenshot in the internet from flexscan 3.1.7

https://www.dropbox.com/s/j7nyoznec3ua9 ... a.JPG?dl=0

So no chance to give it a try with imaging source / david cam?

regards, spark
User avatar
Micr0
Posts: 586
Joined: 15 Nov 2016, 15:20
Location: New York City

Re: David 5 VS Flexscan3d

Post by Micr0 »

From what I could tell 3DLMI isn't selling the software without their hardware. Their hardware uses the Point Grey cameras and the Nikon or Cannon DSLR's are used for color/texture maps. I was going to reach out to one of their VAR's and see if I could get more info and possibly a demo. I'll post if I do.
µ
3dxcan
Posts: 74
Joined: 02 Jun 2017, 17:21

Re: David 5 VS Flexscan3d

Post by 3dxcan »

erapip wrote: 10 Mar 2017, 19:57 Yes, same hardware and setup. Flex is 3.1.7 that allow to costumade.
I installed 3.1.0.5, but it only allows uEye and PTgrey.
Post Reply