Artec Spider - David Comparison.

What have you scanned recently?
Post Reply
User avatar
Micr0
Posts: 395
Joined: 15 Nov 2016, 15:20

Artec Spider - David Comparison.

Post by Micr0 » 07 Feb 2020, 00:23

I met someone online with an Artec Space Spider and he agreed to scan a couple of hardware pieces so we could compare scans. The two pieces are, one cast iron, and one stamped steel cabinet pull. They are each about 80mm - 100 mm long. Here are screen grabs of the results:

David first:
file6.jpg
file5.jpg
file1.jpg
Artec Space Spider:
Cast Iron Deco Pull Smooth 1.jpg
Ornate Pull 2.jpg
µ

User avatar
Micr0
Posts: 395
Joined: 15 Nov 2016, 15:20

Re: Artec Spider - David Comparison.

Post by Micr0 » 07 Feb 2020, 00:29

Time to scan those 2 pulls including align and fuse in David: ~30min.
Time to scan both pulls with the Spider including process in Artec Studio 14: ~5min
µ

martan
Posts: 64
Joined: 23 May 2018, 19:18
Location: Sweden

Re: Artec Spider - David Comparison.

Post by martan » 07 Feb 2020, 07:14

Nice comparison!

Big difference in time!
I would scan more if it was a faster process than with my setup.
HP 3D Scan, Optoma ML750, 2x IS DMK 23UX236 with Computar 12mm, HP calibration panel, DIY Rotary tables.

User avatar
OBNRacerMan
Posts: 117
Joined: 12 Aug 2019, 09:46
Location: Obninsk, Russia

Re: Artec Spider - David Comparison.

Post by OBNRacerMan » 07 Feb 2020, 07:45

Despite the much faster process, Artec seemed a little weaker in quality.
And if you look at the prices of this equipment ... then I will choose David.

User avatar
Micr0
Posts: 395
Joined: 15 Nov 2016, 15:20

Re: Artec Spider - David Comparison.

Post by Micr0 » 07 Feb 2020, 16:42

OBNRacerMan wrote:
07 Feb 2020, 07:45
Despite the much faster process, Artec seemed a little weaker in quality.
And if you look at the prices of this equipment ... then I will choose David.
My feeling too.
µ

Post Reply