Page 2 of 2
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Posted: 10 Feb 2021, 11:59
by Alonso
Yes, IS DMK 33UX265 cameras
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Posted: 13 Feb 2021, 05:15
by bigbomber
Alonso wrote: ↑08 Feb 2021, 19:51
After spending all last week getting acquainted with FlexScan3D and constantly tweaking my hardware, I feel this is worthy of sharing
Hi Alonso
Can I know why do you scan parts like this Pump Casing? For reverse Engineering? If so, What software do you use for surface modeling an please send some more photos of finished surface part.
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Posted: 13 Feb 2021, 18:50
by Alonso
This scan was just to get more seat time with FlexScan3D
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Posted: 03 Feb 2022, 01:19
by Alonso
New scan of my favorite test subject!
I've been learning a bit more about the camera settings and adjusting accordingly. Very happy with the results. This is a precise merge, no post smoothing applied. Mesh alignment only, no markers were used.
Looking back at the previous scan of this object, I can see some areas where the scans didn't quite align correctly
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Posted: 03 Feb 2022, 06:45
by OBNRacerMan
Looks very good.
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Posted: 03 Feb 2022, 08:54
by greenskynet
nice and clean scan
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Posted: 07 Feb 2022, 17:16
by Micr0
Alonso wrote: ↑03 Feb 2022, 01:19
New scan of my favorite test subject!
I've been learning a bit more about the camera settings and adjusting accordingly. Very happy with the results. This is a precise merge, no post smoothing applied. Mesh alignment only, no markers were used.
Looking back at the previous scan of this object, I can see some areas where the scans didn't quite align correctly
Very nice!
What tweaks did you find most useful?
Keep us updated with you progress.
