Page 1 of 1
Is DMK 72BUC02 a good Choise?
Posted: 03 Feb 2021, 01:05
by bigbomber
Hi
I'm going to grade up my scanner and want to buy two camera to work with HP and also with FlexScan3D.
I wanna to know is the DMK 72BUC02 a suitable camera for my application? does anyone know about format and quality of the camera Images?
Is it a low noise Cam?
Does it yield Important an necessary settings to adjust the cam?
and ....?
The quality of exported image and compatibility of the camera with HP & Flex is the most importance for me.
Also I prefer USB2 cameras, because my PC CPU can not handle high frame rate cameras (also I don't think if any other one can reach out to over 15fps with Diy Scanner due to synchronization limitation).
https://www.theimagingsource.com/produc ... mk72buc02/
Also I'm interested to know if any one has any other suggestion for any other Camera models from any other brands.
Re: Is DMK 72BUC02 a good Choise?
Posted: 03 Feb 2021, 01:57
by Alonso
How old is your pc? Can you not add a pcie card that has usb3 ports?
Re: Is DMK 72BUC02 a good Choise?
Posted: 03 Feb 2021, 02:28
by contactpolyga
Unfortunately that Aptina MT9P031 5MP sensor is literally the nosiest sensor I've ever used, it's low cost for a reason - the data quality is worst than a 1.3mp sensor.
I've had the unfortunate experience of having to use this sensor across many projects dozens of times..
- I know it's low cost but your soul has a cost. I'd rather not eat for a few days, get a modern camera than to have to use this sensor... it's bad, tiny size, rolling shutter, unbelievable noisy, super old (10+ year old design)... the plus... well it's cheap.
Learn from my mistakes, - don't buy this camera...
Re: Is DMK 72BUC02 a good Choise?
Posted: 03 Feb 2021, 07:02
by bigbomber
Alonso wrote: ↑03 Feb 2021, 01:57
How old is your pc? Can you not add a pcie card that has usb3 ports?
My Laptop has USB3 Port. but I think Corei7 CPU and 12G of ram is not enough to handle high frame rate.
at this time I scan using two 2Mpixel Camera and I can feel how much load is over on the CPU.
Re: Is DMK 72BUC02 a good Choise?
Posted: 03 Feb 2021, 07:03
by bigbomber
contactpolyga wrote: ↑03 Feb 2021, 02:28
Unfortunately that Aptina MT9P031 5MP sensor is literally the nosiest sensor I've ever used, it's low cost for a reason - the data quality is worst than a 1.3mp sensor.
I've had the unfortunate experience of having to use this sensor across many projects dozens of times..
- I know it's low cost but your soul has a cost. I'd rather not eat for a few days, get a modern camera than to have to use this sensor... it's bad, tiny size, rolling shutter, unbelievable noisy, super old (10+ year old design)... the plus... well it's cheap.
Learn from my mistakes, - don't buy this camera...
ohhh,
Thank you for sharing this info.
I will find an other one today.
Re: Is DMK 72BUC02 a good Choise?
Posted: 03 Feb 2021, 11:32
by Alonso
bigbomber wrote: ↑03 Feb 2021, 07:02
Alonso wrote: ↑03 Feb 2021, 01:57
How old is your pc? Can you not add a pcie card that has usb3 ports?
My Laptop has USB3 Port. but I think Corei7 CPU and 12G of ram is not enough to handle high frame rate.
at this time I scan using two 2Mpixel Camera and I can feel how much load is over on the CPU.
My old i5-2500k does ok with scanning.
If anything it's probably the single usb3.0 controller struggling with a pair of cameras and not the processor.
Re: Is DMK 72BUC02 a good Choise?
Posted: 03 Feb 2021, 16:39
by lvc505
6fps is very slow
Re: Is DMK 72BUC02 a good Choise?
Posted: 03 Feb 2021, 16:59
by OBNRacerMan
lvc505 wrote: ↑03 Feb 2021, 16:396fps is very slow
I have been using the 3.1MP Toupcam UCMOS3100KPA USB2.0 camera for a while. With the declared 11fps, it actually gave out 7-8 (in HP3DScan) ... and it took about 40 seconds. for one scan with the "quality" setting ...
Re: Is DMK 72BUC02 a good Choise?
Posted: 04 Feb 2021, 01:19
by Micr0
OBNRacerMan wrote: ↑03 Feb 2021, 16:59
lvc505 wrote: ↑03 Feb 2021, 16:396fps is very slow
I have been using the 3.1MP Toupcam UCMOS3100KPA USB2.0 camera for a while. With the declared 11fps, it actually gave out 7-8 (in HP3DScan) ... and it took about 40 seconds. for one scan with the "quality" setting ...
Ouch!
Re: Is DMK 72BUC02 a good Choise?
Posted: 04 Feb 2021, 01:22
by Micr0
Alonso wrote: ↑03 Feb 2021, 11:32
bigbomber wrote: ↑03 Feb 2021, 07:02
Alonso wrote: ↑03 Feb 2021, 01:57
How old is your pc? Can you not add a pcie card that has usb3 ports?
My Laptop has USB3 Port. but I think Corei7 CPU and 12G of ram is not enough to handle high frame rate.
at this time I scan using two 2Mpixel Camera and I can feel how much load is over on the CPU.
My old i5-2500k does ok with scanning.
If anything it's probably the single usb3.0 controller struggling with a pair of cameras and not the processor.
I agree. The i7 (even an older one) should be able to handle 2 USB 3 cameras. My dell laptops is all I use for scanning and it is now nearly 7 years old. I get the full 54 frames from both IS 174 cameras with it.