Micr0 wrote: ↑26 Sep 2020, 14:02
What do you think of the calibration process for RangeVision? Though David is faster my thought is that it is more prone to errors due to the more complex requirement of the calibration hardware.
The calibration process takes much longer than in HP3DScan - then, if necessary, you can "refine" the current calibration (this is faster). It should be borne in mind that due to the peculiarities of the algorithm, where the projector does not participate in the calibration, the program itself does not compensate for small inaccuracies in the position of the cameras (HP allowed us to make a fairly flat scan even with very large discrepancies)
Micr0 wrote: ↑26 Sep 2020, 14:02
Is there any chance you could convince the RangeVision people to do a software only license for people on this board?
Just yesterday, another beta test will end, and the final version of Rangevision 2020.2 software has been released with support for the DIY direction (i.e. homemade scanners that meet the requirements of Rangevision DIY in terms of components).
However, I do not yet know how, and when, it will be possible to buy this (outside of Russia).

- Software switched to English interface
Earlier I already laid out a scan of a souvenir with a small starfish - and the base-shell was not captured there. It was scanned normally in this program.

- This is how the object is visible in the program

- And this is the result
Soft: RangeVision DIY, Calibration panel/Rotary tables - RangeVision, Prj: LG PF1500G, Cam: Daheng Mercury MER2-630-60U3M-L (USB3.0, monochrome) x2, Obj: ZLKC FM12036MP5 (F2.8/5Mp/12-36mm) x2. And a handheld scanner Creality Ferret