Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Yes, IS DMK 33UX265 cameras
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Hi Alonso
Can I know why do you scan parts like this Pump Casing? For reverse Engineering? If so, What software do you use for surface modeling an please send some more photos of finished surface part.
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
This scan was just to get more seat time with FlexScan3D
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
New scan of my favorite test subject!
I've been learning a bit more about the camera settings and adjusting accordingly. Very happy with the results. This is a precise merge, no post smoothing applied. Mesh alignment only, no markers were used.
Looking back at the previous scan of this object, I can see some areas where the scans didn't quite align correctly
I've been learning a bit more about the camera settings and adjusting accordingly. Very happy with the results. This is a precise merge, no post smoothing applied. Mesh alignment only, no markers were used.
Looking back at the previous scan of this object, I can see some areas where the scans didn't quite align correctly

- OBNRacerMan
- Posts: 369
- Joined: 12 Aug 2019, 09:46
- Location: Obninsk, Russia
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Looks very good.
Soft: RangeVision DIY, Calibration panel/Rotary tables - RangeVision, Prj: LG PF1500G, Cam: Daheng Mercury MER2-630-60U3M-L (USB3.0, monochrome) x2, Obj: ZLKC FM12036MP5 (F2.8/5Mp/12-36mm) x2. And a handheld scanner Creality Ferret
- greenskynet
- Posts: 127
- Joined: 12 Nov 2021, 19:02
Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
nice and clean scan 

Re: Turbine housing scanned with FlexScan3D
Very nice!Alonso wrote: ↑03 Feb 2022, 01:19 New scan of my favorite test subject!
I've been learning a bit more about the camera settings and adjusting accordingly. Very happy with the results. This is a precise merge, no post smoothing applied. Mesh alignment only, no markers were used.
Looking back at the previous scan of this object, I can see some areas where the scans didn't quite align correctly![]()
What tweaks did you find most useful?
Keep us updated with you progress.
µ