Some of my scans

[martan]

You must start the AutoIt-script before HP3Dscan. Tried that?

[OBNRacerMan]

You must start the AutoIt-script before HP3Dscan. Tried that?

I know it. But I was not able to get any “reaction” from Deviare at all. Therefore, I had to rewrite the script (and the motor control firmware) so that it would at least process the pressing of the "S" key.
I am not a programmer, so I can not even imagine the reasons for the inoperability.

[OBNRacerMan]

There was also another attempt to scan shiny metal (without filters yet) and without matting:

Appearance of the original three-finger composition - 1 :-)

Appearance of the original three-finger composition - 2 :-)

Combined Parts

Finish merge - 1

Finish merge - 2

Finish merge - 3

P.S. The inscription reads - No money!

[martan]

Nice!

[mading]

Well done!

[Micr0]

Excellent. Thanks for sharing.

[OBNRacerMan]

An additional day off (we have a holiday here), did not know what to do, and decided to conduct a check of the repeatability of the "accuracy" of the scan. Namely, how much the scan made “now” coincides with the scan made “once” (of course, during this time the camera positions, calibrations, etc. have changed many times).
I took a scan made in the summer, made a new scan and combined it. When comparing, the accuracy of 0.15 mm was chosen (at 0.5 (by default) it shows almost no difference at all) - it turned out that it fits quite well

Here is such a result

[OBNRacerMan]

Waiting for the new camera ordered by me to arrive, I decided to scan something else. This time the choice fell on my old mounting pliers:

My old wire cutters

Due to the different brightness of the handles and metal scans made a lot

Result (serifs on the handles are traces of their difficult lives)

[OBNRacerMan]

The first probes with my new MW-SUA630M camera.
So far, I have not been able to get the quality of detail like on old cameras: |
For comparison, I downloaded an old scan made by “a different camera in a different position”, with a different calibration - again everything was correctly combined with the new, “freshly baked” ones. But this is not easier.
Yellow is the scan from the old YW500Y3 camera, blue and purple are from the new:

It seems that everything is fine

It’s even noticeable that the new camera also captured the side ends of the coin

But as soon as we move apart, the problem of detail comes out

In general, we still need to train - there are a lot of settings, but they don’t have “intuitive understandability”.
P.S. The coin on the tests is the same.

[Rashiga]

Interesting both old and newer cameras have similar resolution right?